On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 01:13:26PM +0100, Marcus Folkesson wrote: > This is no bugfix (so no Fixes: tag is necessary) as it is > taken care of in hid_sensor_custom_add_attributes(). > > The motivation for this patch is that: > hid_sensor_custom_field.attr_name and > hid_sensor_custom_field.attrs > has the size of HID_CUSTOM_TOTAL_ATTRS and used in same context. > > We compare against HID_CUSTOM_TOTAL_ATTRS when > looping through hid_custom_attrs. > > We will silent the smatch error: > hid_sensor_custom_add_attributes() error: buffer overflow > 'hid_custom_attrs' 8 <= 10 > > Signed-off-by: Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@xxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- v2: - add acked-by tag > drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c > index 32c2306e240d..602465ad2745 100644 > --- a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c > +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c > @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ struct hid_sensor_sample { > u32 raw_len; > } __packed; > > -static struct attribute hid_custom_attrs[] = { > +static struct attribute hid_custom_attrs[HID_CUSTOM_TOTAL_ATTRS] = { > {.name = "name", .mode = S_IRUGO}, > {.name = "units", .mode = S_IRUGO}, > {.name = "unit-expo", .mode = S_IRUGO}, > -- > 2.38.1 >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature