On 24.06.22 02:46, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Hi Oliver, Hi, > > The reason I believe we should be using interruptible or killable > versions of locking is to give a chance to bail (with Ctrl-C or kill or > whatever) in case the system is wedged for some reason. > > Where would this mistimed harmless signal come from unless user actually > tries to interrupt module loading/driver binding/sysfs access? timers, window size, .... Regards Oliver
