On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 05:53:00AM +0000, cgel.zte@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Simplify the return expression. > > Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/input/touchscreen/da9034-ts.c | 7 +------ > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/da9034-ts.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/da9034-ts.c > index 2943f6a58388..dfb2604381d2 100644 > --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/da9034-ts.c > +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/da9034-ts.c > @@ -298,7 +298,6 @@ static int da9034_touch_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > struct da9034_touch_pdata *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev); > struct da9034_touch *touch; > struct input_dev *input_dev; > - int error; > > touch = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct da9034_touch), > GFP_KERNEL); > @@ -344,11 +343,7 @@ static int da9034_touch_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > touch->input_dev = input_dev; > input_set_drvdata(input_dev, touch); > > - error = input_register_device(input_dev); > - if (error) > - return error; > - > - return 0; > + return input_register_device(input_dev); In cases where there are multiple checks/exit paths in the same function I prefer the existing style as it requires less changes when extending. Thanks, -- Dmitry
