On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 03:44:34AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 04:46:03PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > + * pr_human_readable_u64, pr_human_readable_s64: Print an integer with human
> > > + * readable units.
> >
> > Why not extend vsprintf for this using something like %pH[8|16|32|64]
> > or %pH[c|s|l|ll|uc|us|ul|ull] ?
>
> The %pX extension we have is _cute_, but ultimately a bad idea. It
> centralises all kinds of unrelated things in vsprintf.c, eg bdev_name()
> and clock() and ip_addr_string().
And it's not remotely discoverable. I didn't realize we had bdev_name()
available as a format string until just now or I would've been using it!
> Really, it's working around that we don't have something like Java's
> StringBuffer (which I see both seq_buf and printbuf as attempting to
> be). So we have this primitive format string hack instead of exposing
> methods like:
>
> void dentry_string(struct strbuf *, struct dentry *);
Exactly!
> as an example,
> if (unlikely(ino == dir->i_ino)) {
> EXT4_ERROR_INODE(dir, "'%pd' linked to parent dir",
> dentry);
> return ERR_PTR(-EFSCORRUPTED);
> }
>
> would become something like:
>
> if (unlikely(ino == dir->i_ino)) {
> struct strbuf strbuf;
> strbuf_char(strbuf, '\'');
> dentry_string(strbuf, dentry);
> strbuf_string(strbuf, "' linked to parent dir");
> EXT4_ERROR_INODE(dir, strbuf);
> return ERR_PTR(-EFSCORRUPTED);
> }
>
> which isn't terribly nice, but C has sucky syntax for string
> construction. Other languages have done this better, including Rust.
Over IRC just now you proposed "%p(%p)", dentry_name, dentry - I'm _really_
liking this idea, especially if we can get glibc to take it.
Then your ext4 example becomes just
if (unlikely(ino == dir->i_ino)) {
EXT4_ERROR_INODE(dir, "'%p(%p)' linked to parent dir",
dentry_name, dentry);
return ERR_PTR(-EFSCORRUPTED);
}
And you can cscope to the pretty-printer! And dentry_name becomes just
void dentry_name(struct printbuf *out, struct dentry *dentry)
{
...
}
Which is quite a bit simpler than the current definition.
Sweeeeeet.
