On 15/02/2022 17:51, Danilo Krummrich wrote: > Convert the ps2-gpio dt-binding documentation to DT schema format using > the json-schema. > > Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <danilokrummrich@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/serio/ps2-gpio.txt | 23 -------- > .../devicetree/bindings/serio/ps2-gpio.yaml | 58 +++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serio/ps2-gpio.txt > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serio/ps2-gpio.yaml > Please version your patches in the subject. You can achieve it manually or with `git format-patch -v2`. I think lack of v2 confuses b4 diff ("ERROR: Could not auto-find previous revision "). > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serio/ps2-gpio.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serio/ps2-gpio.yaml > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..41e43d797651 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serio/ps2-gpio.yaml > @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) > +%YAML 1.2 > +--- > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/serio/ps2-gpio.yaml# > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > + > +title: Bindings for GPIO based PS/2 > + > +maintainers: > + - Danilo Krummrich <danilokrummrich@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > + > +properties: > + compatible: > + const: ps2-gpio > + > + data-gpios: > + description: > + the gpio used for the data signal > + maxItems: 1 > + > + clk-gpios: > + description: > + the gpio used for the clock signal > + maxItems: 1 > + > + interrupts: > + description: > + The given interrupt should trigger on the falling edge of the clock line. > + maxItems: 1 > + > + write-enable: > + type: boolean > + description: > + Indicates whether write function is provided to serio device. Possibly > + providing the write function will not work, because of the tough timing > + requirements. > + > +required: > + - compatible > + - data-gpios > + - clk-gpios > + - interrupts > + > +additionalProperties: true > + I missed this part (lack of) in your v1. This has to be false. Best regards, Krzysztof