Hi Tero, On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 5:43 PM Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > Another update here based on received feedback. Main change compared to v2: If that's OK with you, I'd like to cherry-pick some patches from the series: 1/7, 2/7 (the version from v4 because I requested changes), 4/7 and a lighter 5/7 where we don't have the MSC events we are still discussing. So Ideally, can you post a v4 based on top of hid.git/for-next (without my hid-bpf changes) with those 4 patches? Patch 3 is still up for discussion, and patches 6 and 7 are obviously RFC. Actually, Patch 3 could be split into a part where you add the HID usages and a part with the mapping of them. The HID usages part can be integrated now too, and we'll have the USI mapping that would require Dmitry's ack in a separate patch. But if you prefer having everything in one series, that's fine by me too. Cheers, Benjamin > > - Dropped patch #5 : HID: core: map USI pen style reports directly > This is not needed anymore, as the same result can be reached by > modifying the flags of the relevant field in rdesc. This is done now > as part of patch #7 in the BPF code. > > I also dropped one of the fixes from my test branch [1] as pointed out > by Benjamin, it is not needed if the BPF program is executed with the > modalias link. > > Updated test branch can be found from [2]. > > -Tero > > [1] > https://github.com/t-kristo/linux/commit/81b27fd46780ce67c2706d586c0f4a437e87dbf6 > (HID: bpf: fix file mapping) > [2] https://github.com/t-kristo/linux/commits/usi-5.16-rfc-v3-bpf > >
