On 22.10.2021 08:47, Juergen Gross wrote: > Today the non-essential pv devices are hard coded in the xenbus driver > and this list is lacking multiple entries. > > This series reworks the detection logic of non-essential devices by > adding a flag for that purpose to struct xenbus_driver. I'm wondering whether it wouldn't better be the other way around: The (hopefully few) essential ones get flagged, thus also making it more prominent during patch review that a flag gets added (and justification provided), instead of having to spot the lack of a flag getting set. Jan
