Re: [PATCH] Input: elantench - Fix the firmware misreport coordinates for trackpoint occasionally.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Phoenix,

On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 08:19:48PM +0800, phoenix wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
> 
> Would you review this patch, thanks
> 
> Best regards,
> Phoenix Huang
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phoenix Huang [mailto:phoenix@xxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2021 9:10 AM
> To: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-input@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: jingle.wu@xxxxxxxxxx; josh.chen@xxxxxxxxxx; dave.wang@xxxxxxxxxx;
> Phoenix Huang <phoenix@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [PATCH] Input: elantench - Fix the firmware misreport coordinates
> for trackpoint occasionally.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Phoenix Huang <phoenix@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c b/drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c
> index 2d0bc029619f..07e1098f2d31 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c
> @@ -517,6 +517,17 @@ static void elantech_report_trackpoint(struct psmouse
> *psmouse,
>  	case 0x16008020U:
>  	case 0x26800010U:
>  	case 0x36808000U:
> +	
> +		/* This firmware misreport coordinates for trackpoint
> occasionally.
> +		* So we discard these packets by pattern to prevent cursor
> jumps.
> +		*/
> +		if (packet[4] == 0x80 || packet[5] == 0x80 ||
> +		    packet[1] >> 7 == packet[4] >> 7 ||

I think this will reject X coordinates in range [0, 127]. Is this really
what is needed? What kind of patterns are you observing when firmware
misreports coordinates?

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Omap]

  Powered by Linux