On 8/22/21 4:43 PM, F.A.Sulaiman wrote:
Syzbot reported slab-out-of-bounds Write bug in hid-betopff driver.
The problem is the driver assumes the device must have an input report but
some malicious devices violate this assumption.
So this patch checks hid_device's input is non empty before it's been used.
Reported-by: syzbot+07efed3bc5a1407bd742@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: F.A. SULAIMAN <asha.16@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/hid/hid-betopff.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-betopff.c b/drivers/hid/hid-betopff.c
index 0790fbd3fc9a..2d62bde21413 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-betopff.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-betopff.c
@@ -116,6 +116,11 @@ static int betop_probe(struct hid_device *hdev, const struct hid_device_id *id)
{
int ret;
+ if (list_empty(&hdev->inputs)) {
+ hid_err(hdev, "no inputs found\n");
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
if (id->driver_data)
hdev->quirks |= HID_QUIRK_MULTI_INPUT;
I am still able to trigger reported slab-out-bound with this patch
applied, please move this sanity check inside betopff_init().
Jiri, does it make sense to add proper error handling of betopff_init()?
Nowadays betop_probe() just ignores betopff_init() return value. It
looks wrong to me.
I think, Asha can prepare a patch series with these 2 changes
With regards,
Pavel Skripkin