Hi Yizhuo, On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 10:26:09AM -0700, Yizhuo Zhai wrote: > Inside function hideep_nvm_unlock(), variable "unmask_code" could > be uninitialized if hideep_pgm_r_reg() returns error, however, it > is used in the later if statement after an "and" operation, which > is potentially unsafe. I do not think that simply initializing the variable makes the code behave any better. If we want to fix this properly we need to check for errors returned by hideep_pgm_r_reg() and hideep_pgm_w_reg() and exit this function early, signalling the caller about errors. > > Signed-off-by: Yizhuo <yzhai003@xxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/input/touchscreen/hideep.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/hideep.c > b/drivers/input/touchscreen/hideep.c > index ddad4a82a5e5..49b713ad4384 100644 > --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/hideep.c > +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/hideep.c > @@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ static int hideep_enter_pgm(struct hideep_ts *ts) > > static void hideep_nvm_unlock(struct hideep_ts *ts) > { > - u32 unmask_code; > + u32 unmask_code = 0; > > hideep_pgm_w_reg(ts, HIDEEP_FLASH_CFG, HIDEEP_NVM_SFR_RPAGE); > hideep_pgm_r_reg(ts, 0x0000000C, &unmask_code); > -- > 2.17.1 Thanks. -- Dmitry