Quoting Dmitry Torokhov (2021-01-07 11:46:48) > > Yes, I understand that on some devices the proximity sensors are not > true sensors but rather on/off signals, potentially derived from a > multitude of sources. However there is still a benefit in exposing them > as IIO proximity devices with limited reporting representing > [near, infinity] range/values. This will mean that userspace needs to > monitor only one set of devices (IIO) instead of both IIO and input, and > will not require constantly expanding EV_SW set to account for > ever-growing number of proximity sensors (lap, palm, general presence, > etc). Ok, no problem. I think I'll have to spin up a small driver to handle this as an IIO proximity device and then register the IIO child device from the cros ec driver. Let me see how that goes.
