On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 5:36 PM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Quoting Philip Chen (2021-01-13 17:25:13)
> > diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c
> > index b379ed7628781..273e3c9ba0b03 100644
> > --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c
> > +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c
> > @@ -578,6 +590,19 @@ static int cros_ec_keyb_register_matrix(struct cros_ec_keyb *ckdev)
> > ckdev->idev = idev;
> > cros_ec_keyb_compute_valid_keys(ckdev);
> >
> > + of_property_for_each_u32(dev->of_node, "function-row-physmap",
> > + prop, p, key_pos) {
> > + if (i >= MAX_NUM_TOP_ROW_KEYS) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "Only support up to %d top row keys.\n",
>
> dev_warn? And drop the period please as we don't add them in the kernel
> usually.
Done.
>
> > + MAX_NUM_TOP_ROW_KEYS);
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + ckdev->function_row_physmap[i] = MATRIX_SCAN_CODE(
>
> Maybe grow some more local variables, like for function_row_physmap so
> this can fit on one line?
Done. Please take a look at v6.
>
> row = KEY_ROW(key_pos);
> col = KEY_COL(key_pos);
> map[i] = MATRIX_SCAN_CODE(row, col, ckdev->row_shift);
>
> > + KEY_ROW(key_pos), KEY_COL(key_pos), ckdev->row_shift);
> > + i++;
>
> We could remove this and just increment num_function_row_keys instead.
> Then that condition check may be a little longer but probably still ok.
Done. Please take a look at v6.
>
>
> > + }
> > + ckdev->num_function_row_keys = i;
> > +
> > err = input_register_device(ckdev->idev);
> > if (err) {
> > dev_err(dev, "cannot register input device\n");
