Hi
2021. január 2., szombat 23:30 keltezéssel, Roderick Colenbrander írta:
> From: Roderick Colenbrander <roderick.colenbrander@xxxxxxxx>
>
> Report DualSense battery status information through power_supply class.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roderick Colenbrander <roderick.colenbrander@xxxxxxxx>
> [...]
> @@ -21,6 +21,13 @@
> /* Base class for playstation devices. */
> struct ps_device {
> struct hid_device *hdev;
> + spinlock_t lock;
I'm not sure, but isn't a spin_lock_init() missing from the code?
> +
> + struct power_supply_desc battery_desc;
> + struct power_supply *battery;
> + uint8_t battery_capacity;
> + int battery_status;
> +
> uint8_t mac_address[6];
>
> int (*parse_report)(struct ps_device *dev, struct hid_report *report, u8 *data, int size);
> [...]
> @@ -136,6 +148,71 @@ static struct input_dev *ps_allocate_input_dev(struct hid_device *hdev, const ch
> return input_dev;
> }
>
> +static enum power_supply_property ps_power_supply_props[] = {
> + POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_STATUS,
> + POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_PRESENT,
> + POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CAPACITY,
> + POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_SCOPE
I believe the preferred way is to have a comma after each array/enum/etc. element
unless it is a terminating entry.
> +};
> [...]
> @@ -201,7 +278,9 @@ static int dualsense_parse_report(struct ps_device *ps_dev, struct hid_report *r
> struct hid_device *hdev = ps_dev->hdev;
> struct dualsense *ds = container_of(ps_dev, struct dualsense, base);
> struct dualsense_input_report *ds_report;
> - uint8_t value;
> + uint8_t battery_data, battery_capacity, charging_status, value;
> + int battery_status;
> + unsigned long flags;
>
> /* DualSense in USB uses the full HID report for reportID 1, but
> * Bluetooth uses a minimal HID report for reportID 1 and reports
> @@ -242,12 +321,48 @@ static int dualsense_parse_report(struct ps_device *ps_dev, struct hid_report *r
> input_report_key(ds->gamepad, BTN_MODE, ds_report->buttons[2] & DS_BUTTONS2_PS_HOME);
> input_sync(ds->gamepad);
>
> + battery_data = ds_report->status & DS_STATUS_BATTERY_CAPACITY;
> + charging_status = (ds_report->status & DS_STATUS_CHARGING) >> DS_STATUS_CHARGING_SHIFT;
> +
> + switch (charging_status) {
> + case 0x0:
> + /* Each unit of battery data corresponds to 10%
> + * 0 = 0-9%, 1 = 10-19%, .. and 10 = 100%
> + */
> + battery_capacity = battery_data == 10 ? 100 : battery_data * 10 + 5;
In my opinion `min(battery_data * 10 + 5, 100)` seems cleaner, what do you think?
> + battery_status = POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS_DISCHARGING;
> + break;
> + case 0x1:
> + battery_capacity = battery_data == 10 ? 100 : battery_data * 10 + 5;
> + battery_status = POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS_CHARGING;
> + break;
> + case 0x2:
> + battery_capacity = 100;
> + battery_status = POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS_FULL;
> + break;
> + case 0xa: /* voltage or temperature out of range */
> + case 0xb: /* temperature error */
> + battery_capacity = 0;
> + battery_status = POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS_NOT_CHARGING;
> + break;
> + case 0xf: /* charging error */
> + default:
> + battery_capacity = 0;
> + battery_status = POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS_UNKNOWN;
> + }
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ps_dev->lock, flags);
> + ps_dev->battery_capacity = battery_capacity;
> + ps_dev->battery_status = battery_status;
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ps_dev->lock, flags);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> static struct ps_device *dualsense_create(struct hid_device *hdev)
> {
> struct dualsense *ds;
> + struct ps_device *ps_dev;
> int ret;
>
> ds = devm_kzalloc(&hdev->dev, sizeof(*ds), GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -259,8 +374,11 @@ static struct ps_device *dualsense_create(struct hid_device *hdev)
> */
> hdev->version |= HID_PLAYSTATION_VERSION_PATCH;
>
> - ds->base.hdev = hdev;
> - ds->base.parse_report = dualsense_parse_report;
> + ps_dev = &ds->base;
> + ps_dev->hdev = hdev;
> + ps_dev->battery_capacity = 100; /* initial value until parse_report. */
> + ps_dev->battery_status = POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS_UNKNOWN;
> + ps_dev->parse_report = dualsense_parse_report;
> hid_set_drvdata(hdev, ds);
>
> ret = dualsense_get_mac_address(ds);
> @@ -276,6 +394,10 @@ static struct ps_device *dualsense_create(struct hid_device *hdev)
> goto err;
> }
>
> + ret = ps_device_register_battery(ps_dev);
> + if (ret < 0)
I believe if `ps_device_register_battery()` can only return 0 on success or
an errno, then `if (ret)` would be better.
> + goto err;
> +
> return &ds->base;
>
> err:
Regards,
Barnabás Pőcze
