Hi Dmitry, On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 04:49:48PM +0000, Roy Im wrote: > On Friday, December 18, 2020 3:50 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > The OF match table is only used when OF is enabled. > > > > Fixes: cd3f609823a5 ("Input: new da7280 haptic driver") > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/input/misc/da7280.c | 2 ++ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/da7280.c b/drivers/input/misc/da7280.c index 2f698a8c1d65..b08610d6e575 100644 > > --- a/drivers/input/misc/da7280.c > > +++ b/drivers/input/misc/da7280.c > > @@ -1300,11 +1300,13 @@ static int __maybe_unused da7280_resume(struct device *dev) > > return retval; > > } > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_OF > > static const struct of_device_id da7280_of_match[] = { > > { .compatible = "dlg,da7280", }, > > { } > > }; > > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, da7280_of_match); > > +#endif Just for my own understanding, would it not work just as well to include of_device.h? This includes mod_devicetable.h which in turn defines the of_device_id struct (even if CONFIG_OF is not set). The reason for asking is because it seems many drivers do not include these guards. > > > > static const struct i2c_device_id da7280_i2c_id[] = { > > { "da7280", }, > > -- > > 2.29.2.729.g45daf8777d-goog > > > > > > -- > > Dmitry > > Thanks! > > Acked-by: Roy Im <roy.im.opensource@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Kind regards, Jeff LaBundy