On Sat, 2020-11-21 at 17:56 +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 18:03:31 +0800
> Ye Xiang <xiang.ye@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > The Hinge sensor is a common custom sensor on laptops. It
> > calculates
> > the angle between the lid (screen) and the base (keyboard). In
> > addition,
> > it also exposes screen and the keyboard angels with respect to the
> > ground. Applications can easily get laptop's status in space
> > through
> > this sensor, in order to display appropriate user interface.
>
> I'm a little unclear on why the 3 axes aren't treated as a single
> sensor.
> You seem to always grab the 3 together or am I missing something?
>
> That will greatly simplify things and get rid of the need to have
> a shared trigger with the problems that causes in the previous
> patch.
They are not three axes, they are independent. Xiang did try adding x,
y and z component to represent x as hinge, y as keyboard and z as lid.
But I was not convinced.
The problem is that then what will be sysfs interface? They are really
a three sensors. Or we create new interface to call
in_angl_raw_keyboard
in_angl_raw_screen
in_angl_raw_lid.
Thanks,
Srinivas
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jonathan
>
> > Signed-off-by: Ye Xiang <xiang.ye@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > .../hid-sensors/hid-sensor-attributes.c | 2 +
> > drivers/iio/position/Kconfig | 16 +
> > drivers/iio/position/Makefile | 3 +
> > .../iio/position/hid-sensor-custom-hinge.c | 412
> > ++++++++++++++++++
>
> Given it's custom probably needs a more specific name. I guess
> hid-sensor-custom-intel-hinge.c might be safe?
>
> Same for other places we need names in here.
>
> > 4 files changed, 433 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/iio/position/hid-sensor-custom-hinge.c
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-attributes.c
> > b/drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-attributes.c
> > index 442ff787f7af..5b822a4298a0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-attributes.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-attributes.c
> > @@ -71,6 +71,8 @@ static struct {
> > {HID_USAGE_SENSOR_TEMPERATURE, HID_USAGE_SENSOR_UNITS_DEGREES,
> > 1000, 0},
> >
> > {HID_USAGE_SENSOR_HUMIDITY, 0, 1000, 0},
> > + {HID_USAGE_SENSOR_HINGE, 0, 0, 17453293},
> > + {HID_USAGE_SENSOR_HINGE, HID_USAGE_SENSOR_UNITS_DEGREES, 0,
> > 17453293},
> > };
> >
> > static void simple_div(int dividend, int divisor, int *whole,
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/position/Kconfig
> > b/drivers/iio/position/Kconfig
> > index eda67f008c5b..0346f6f2b422 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/position/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/position/Kconfig
> > @@ -16,4 +16,20 @@ config IQS624_POS
> > To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
> > will be called iqs624-pos.
> >
> > +config HID_SENSOR_CUSTOM_HINGE
> > + depends on HID_SENSOR_HUB
> > + select IIO_BUFFER
> > + select IIO_TRIGGERED_BUFFER
> > + select HID_SENSOR_IIO_COMMON
> > + select HID_SENSOR_IIO_TRIGGER
> > + tristate "HID Hinge"
> > + help
> > + This sensor present three angles, hinge angel, screen angles
> > + and keyboard angle respect to horizon (ground).
> > + Say yes here to build support for the HID SENSOR CUSTOM
> > + HINGE.
>
> Capitalization is a bit odd looking. I'd drop it.
>
> > +
> > + To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the
> > + module will be called hid-sensor-custom-hinge.
> > +
> > endmenu
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/position/Makefile
> > b/drivers/iio/position/Makefile
> > index 3cbe7a734352..7a6225977a01 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/position/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/position/Makefile
> > @@ -5,3 +5,6 @@
> > # When adding new entries keep the list in alphabetical order
> >
> > obj-$(CONFIG_IQS624_POS) += iqs624-pos.o
> > +
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_HID_SENSOR_CUSTOM_HINGE) += hid-sensor-custom-hinge.o
>
> Alphabetical order preferred.
>
> > +ccflags-y += -I$(srctree)/drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors
>
> Why?
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/position/hid-sensor-custom-hinge.c
> > b/drivers/iio/position/hid-sensor-custom-hinge.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..a91b333f36fa
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/position/hid-sensor-custom-hinge.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,412 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > +/*
> > + * HID Sensors Driver
> > + * Copyright (c) 2020, Intel Corporation.
> > + */
> > +#include <linux/hid-sensor-hub.h>
> > +#include <linux/iio/buffer.h>
> > +#include <linux/iio/iio.h>
> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > +
> > +#include "hid-sensor-trigger.h"
> > +
> > +/* Channel definitions */
> > +static const struct iio_chan_spec hinge_channels[] = {
> > + { .type = IIO_ANGL,
> > + .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW),
> > + .info_mask_shared_by_type =
> > + BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_OFFSET) | BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE)
> > |
> > + BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ) |
> > BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_HYSTERESIS),
> > + .scan_type.realbits = 16,
> > + .scan_type.storagebits = 32,
>
> It a bit odd to see a single channel that is 16 bits inside a 32 bit
> with
> no shift or similar. Why not just pack it into 16 bits?
>
> > + .scan_type.sign = 's',
> > + .scan_index = 0 },
> > +
> > + IIO_CHAN_SOFT_TIMESTAMP(1)
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct hinge_state {
> > + struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
> > + struct hid_sensor_hub_attribute_info hinge;
> > + /* Reserve for 1 channel + pading + timestamp */
> > + u32 hinge_val[1 + 3];
>
> __aligned(8)
>
> see below for requirements on this.
> Perhaps better to use
>
> struct hinge_scan {
> u32 val;
> s64 timestamp __aligned(8); // Note this is needed for
> x86_32
> } scan;
>
> > + int scale_pre_decml;
> > + int scale_post_decml;
> > + int scale_precision;
> > + int value_offset;
> > + int64_t timestamp;
> > + u32 hinge_address;
> > +};
> > +
> > +#define IIO_DEV_NUM 3
>
> That needs a prefix to make it clear it's not a generic constant
> but is specific to this driver.
>
> > +
> > +struct hinge_group {
> > + struct hinge_state *hg_states[IIO_DEV_NUM];
> > + struct hid_sensor_hub_callbacks callbacks;
> > + struct hid_sensor_common common_attributes;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct hinge_group *hg_group;
>
> We shouldn't see globals like this. Please figure out how to avoid
> it.
>
> > +
> > +/* Channel read_raw handler */
> > +static int hinge_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > + struct iio_chan_spec const *chan, int *val,
> > int *val2,
> > + long mask)
> > +{
> > + struct hinge_state *hg_state = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > + struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev;
> > + int report_id = -1;
> > + int ret_type;
> > + s32 min;
> > +
> > + hsdev = hg_group->common_attributes.hsdev;
> > +
> > + *val = 0;
> > + *val2 = 0;
> > + switch (mask) {
> > + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
> > + hid_sensor_power_state(&hg_group->common_attributes,
> > true);
> > + report_id = hg_state->hinge.report_id;
> > + min = hg_state->hinge.logical_minimum;
> > + if (report_id < 0) {
> > + *val = 0;
> > + hid_sensor_power_state(&hg_group-
> > >common_attributes,
> > + false);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + *val = sensor_hub_input_attr_get_raw_value(
> > + hg_group->common_attributes.hsdev, hsdev-
> > >usage,
> > + hg_state->hinge_address, report_id,
> > SENSOR_HUB_SYNC,
> > + min < 0);
> > +
> > + hid_sensor_power_state(&hg_group->common_attributes,
> > false);
> > + ret_type = IIO_VAL_INT;
> > + break;
> > + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
> > + *val = hg_state->scale_pre_decml;
> > + *val2 = hg_state->scale_post_decml;
> > + ret_type = hg_state->scale_precision;
> > + break;
> > + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_OFFSET:
> > + *val = hg_state->value_offset;
> > + ret_type = IIO_VAL_INT;
> > + break;
> > + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ:
> > + ret_type = hid_sensor_read_samp_freq_value(
> > + &hg_group->common_attributes, val, val2);
> > + break;
> > + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_HYSTERESIS:
> > + ret_type = hid_sensor_read_raw_hyst_value(
> > + &hg_group->common_attributes, val, val2);
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + ret_type = -EINVAL;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return ret_type;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* Channel write_raw handler */
> > +static int hinge_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > + struct iio_chan_spec const *chan, int val,
> > int val2,
> > + long mask)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + switch (mask) {
> > + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ:
> > + ret = hid_sensor_write_samp_freq_value(
> > + &hg_group->common_attributes, val, val2);
> > + break;
> > + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_HYSTERESIS:
> > + ret = hid_sensor_write_raw_hyst_value(
> > + &hg_group->common_attributes, val, val2);
> > +
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct iio_info hinge_info = {
> > + .read_raw = &hinge_read_raw,
> > + .write_raw = &hinge_write_raw,
> > +};
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Function to push data to buffer;
> > + * wrapper added for symmetry with other hid-sensor drivers
> > + */
> > +static void hid_sensor_push_data(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, void
> > *data, int len,
>
> This doesn't seem to be generic, so don't name it as such.
>
> > + int64_t timestamp)
> > +{
> > + iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(indio_dev, data, timestamp);
> I hope that data buffer obeys the various rules needed by (and
> admittedly
> not that well documented) iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp()
>
> 1. Needs to be 8 byte aligned.
> 2. Needs to have space for an aligned 8 byte timestamp at the end.
>
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Callback handler to send event after all samples are received
> > + * and captured.
> > + */
> > +static int hinge_proc_event(struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev,
> > + unsigned int usage_id, void *priv)
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < IIO_DEV_NUM; ++i) {
> If we push for all sensors together, better to have
> this as a single iio_device with 3 channels.
>
> Use the channel labels (just added to IIO) to identify which is
> which.
>
> > + struct hinge_state *hg_state;
> > + struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
> > +
> > + hg_state = hg_group->hg_states[i];
> > + indio_dev = hg_state->indio_dev;
> > +
> > + dev_dbg(&indio_dev->dev, "%s timestamp:%llu
> > scan_bytes:%d\n",
> > + __func__, hg_state->timestamp, indio_dev-
> > >scan_bytes);
> > +
> > + if (!hg_state->timestamp)
> > + hg_state->timestamp =
> > iio_get_time_ns(indio_dev);
> > +
> > + hid_sensor_push_data(indio_dev, hg_state->hinge_val,
> > + sizeof(hg_state->hinge_val),
> > + hg_state->timestamp);
> > +
> > + hg_state->timestamp = 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* Capture samples in local storage */
> > +static int hinge_capture_sample(struct hid_sensor_hub_device
> > *hsdev,
> > + unsigned int usage_id, size_t raw_len,
> > + char *raw_data, void *priv)
> > +{
> > + struct hinge_state *hg_state;
> > + int offset;
> > + int ret = -EINVAL;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + if (usage_id == HID_USAGE_SENSOR_TIME_TIMESTAMP) {
> > + for (i = 0; i < IIO_DEV_NUM; i++)
> > + hg_group->hg_states[i]->timestamp =
>
> This rather implies all the data is captured together... If so single
> iio_device may make more sense.
>
> > + hid_sensor_convert_timestamp(
> > + &hg_group->common_attributes,
> > + *(int64_t *)raw_data);
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > + switch (usage_id) {
> > + case HID_USAGE_SENSOR_DATA_FIELD_CUSTOM_VALUE_1:
> > + case HID_USAGE_SENSOR_DATA_FIELD_CUSTOM_VALUE_2:
> > + case HID_USAGE_SENSOR_DATA_FIELD_CUSTOM_VALUE_3:
> > + offset = usage_id -
> > HID_USAGE_SENSOR_DATA_FIELD_CUSTOM_VALUE_1;
> > + hg_state = hg_group->hg_states[offset];
> > + hg_state->hinge_val[0] = *(u32 *)raw_data;
> > + ret = 0;
>
> return 0;
>
> > + break;
> > + default:
> return -EINVAL;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* Parse report which is specific to an usage id */
> > +static int hinge_parse_report(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > + struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev,
> > + unsigned int usage_id, unsigned int
> > attr_usage_id,
> > + struct hinge_state *st)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = sensor_hub_input_get_attribute_info(
> > + hsdev, HID_INPUT_REPORT, usage_id, attr_usage_id, &st-
> > >hinge);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + st->hinge_address = attr_usage_id;
> > + st->scale_precision =
> > + hid_sensor_format_scale(HID_USAGE_SENSOR_HINGE, &st-
> > >hinge,
> > + &st->scale_pre_decml,
> > + &st->scale_post_decml);
> > +
> > + /* Set Sensitivity field ids, when there is no individual
> > modifier */
> > + if (hg_group->common_attributes.sensitivity.index < 0) {
> > + sensor_hub_input_get_attribute_info(
> > + hsdev, HID_FEATURE_REPORT, usage_id,
> > + HID_USAGE_SENSOR_DATA_MOD_CHANGE_SENSITIVITY_AB
> > S |
> > + HID_USAGE_SENSOR_DATA_FIELD_CUSTOM_VALU
> > E_1,
> > + &hg_group->common_attributes.sensitivity);
> > + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Sensitivity index:report %d:%d\n",
> > + hg_group->common_attributes.sensitivity.index,
> > + hg_group-
> > >common_attributes.sensitivity.report_id);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* Function to initialize the processing for usage id */
> > +static int hinge_add_iio_device(struct platform_device *pdev, int
> > index,
> > + const char *name, struct hinge_state
> > **st)
> > +{
> > + struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev = pdev->dev.platform_data;
> > + struct hinge_state *hg_state;
> > + struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + indio_dev =
> > + devm_iio_device_alloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct
> > hinge_state));
>
> sizeof (*hg_state) preferred.
>
> > + if (indio_dev == NULL)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + hg_state = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > + hg_state->indio_dev = indio_dev;
> > +
> > + indio_dev->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(hinge_channels);
> > + indio_dev->channels =
> > + kmemdup(hinge_channels, sizeof(hinge_channels),
> > GFP_KERNEL);
>
> I don't immediately see anything that is modifying channels. As such
> you
> should be able have it shared by all the instances.
>
> > + if (!indio_dev->channels)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + ret = hinge_parse_report(
> > + pdev, hsdev, hsdev->usage,
> > + HID_USAGE_SENSOR_DATA_FIELD_CUSTOM_VALUE_1 + index,
> > hg_state);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to setup attributes\n");
> > + goto error_free_dev_mem;
> > + }
> > +
> > + indio_dev->dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
> > + indio_dev->info = &hinge_info;
> > + indio_dev->name = name;
> > + indio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
> > +
> > + ret = hid_sensor_setup_trigger(indio_dev, name,
> > + &hg_group->common_attributes);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "trigger setup failed\n");
> > + goto error_free_dev_mem;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = iio_device_register(indio_dev);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "device register failed\n");
> > + goto error_remove_trigger;
> > + }
> > +
> > + *st = hg_state;
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > +error_remove_trigger:
> > + hid_sensor_remove_trigger(indio_dev, &hg_group-
> > >common_attributes);
> > +error_free_dev_mem:
> > + kfree(indio_dev->channels);
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* Function to deinitialize the processing for usage id */
> > +static int hinge_remove_iio_device(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > int index)
> > +{
> > + struct hinge_state *hg_state = hg_group->hg_states[index];
> > + struct iio_dev *indio_dev = hg_state->indio_dev;
> > +
> > + iio_device_unregister(indio_dev);
> > + hid_sensor_remove_trigger(indio_dev, &hg_group-
> > >common_attributes);
> > + kfree(indio_dev->channels);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int hid_hinge_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct hinge_state *hg_state;
> > + struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev = pdev->dev.platform_data;
> > + static const char *const names[] = { "hinge", "screen",
> > "keyboard" };
> > + int ret;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + hg_group = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct hinge_group),
> > + GFP_KERNEL);
>
> As mentioned above, I'd really not expect to see a global like this.
> Technically nothing stops there being more than one instance of this
> device on a platform (even if that would be a bit odd) + it's almost
> always cleaner to not use a global in the first place.
>
> > + if (!hg_group)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + hg_group->common_attributes.hsdev = hsdev;
> > + hg_group->common_attributes.pdev = pdev;
> > +
> > + ret = hid_sensor_parse_common_attributes(hsdev, hsdev->usage,
> > + &hg_group-
> > >common_attributes);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to setup common
> > attributes\n");
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + atomic_set(&hg_group->common_attributes.data_ready, 0);
> > + for (i = 0; i < IIO_DEV_NUM; i++) {
> > + ret = hinge_add_iio_device(pdev, i, names[i],
> > &hg_state);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto err_probe;
> > +
> > + hg_group->hg_states[i] = hg_state;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* use the first iio device to do the PM */
> > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, hg_group->hg_states[0]->indio_dev);
> > +
> > + hg_group->callbacks.send_event = hinge_proc_event;
> > + hg_group->callbacks.capture_sample = hinge_capture_sample;
> > + hg_group->callbacks.pdev = pdev;
> > + ret = sensor_hub_register_callback(hsdev, hsdev->usage,
> > + &hg_group->callbacks);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "callback reg failed\n");
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > +err_probe:
> > + for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
> > + hinge_remove_iio_device(pdev, i);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* Function to deinitialize the processing for usage id */
> > +static int hid_hinge_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev = pdev->dev.platform_data;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + sensor_hub_remove_callback(hsdev, hsdev->usage);
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < IIO_DEV_NUM; i++)
> > + hinge_remove_iio_device(pdev, i);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct platform_device_id hid_hinge_ids[] = {
> > + {
> > + /* Format: HID-SENSOR-INT-usage_id_in_hex_lowercase */
> > + .name = "HID-SENSOR-INT-020b",
> > + },
> > + { /* sentinel */ }
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, hid_hinge_ids);
> > +
> > +static struct platform_driver hid_hinge_platform_driver = {
> > + .id_table = hid_hinge_ids,
> > + .driver = {
> > + .name = KBUILD_MODNAME,
> > + .pm = &hid_sensor_pm_ops,
> > + },
> > + .probe = hid_hinge_probe,
> > + .remove = hid_hinge_remove,
> > +};
> > +module_platform_driver(hid_hinge_platform_driver);
> > +
> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("HID Sensor Custom Hinge");
> > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Ye Xiang <xiang.ye@xxxxxxxxx>");
> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
