Hi, On 11/19/20 4:16 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Wed, 2020-11-11 at 22:23 -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: >> <snip> >> I am not sure if multiplexing all proximity switches into one evdev >> node >> is that great option, as I am sure we'll soon have devices with 2x >> palmrest switches and being capable finely adjusting transmit power, >> etc. > > Hans, Mark, so is there a consensus to how we should export the "lap- > mode"? Given Dmitry's input itl ooks like we need to go back to using iio for this. Probably with something like my initial proposal wherre we add an in_proximity_location sysfs attribute to the iio-devices which represent the lap-mode and palmrest sensors. But ChromeOS is doing something different to figure out which sensor is which, so this needs a bit more discussion. I'll go and reply to Dmitry's latest mail on this now and then we will see from there. > I had nearly finished working on updated code and all the test suite > changes needed to use an input device with switches when IIO started > being discussed, so I stopped in my tracks. Ouch, sorry about this. Regards, Hans
