Is delayed work's precision good enough for input-poller?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi everyone,
I just found about an issue in the downstream Raspberry Pi[1] kernel that I
wonder if it'd be worth fixing generally. The official RPi DSI display
touchscreen uses the polled input interface. The ts chip works at around 60Hz,
and that's the period the driver is configured to use (17ms). This doesn't play
too good on systems with low HZ (100/250). Users complain that in practice they
experience, at worst, half the event rate. This is due to the rounding error
when converting milliseconds to jiffies, general system delays, and what not.

We could somewhat fix this in the driver (raspberrypi-ts.c) by playing with the
poll rate. But it seems pretty hacky and would ultimately stress the CPU
unnecessarily. I wonder to what extent it makes sense to move the
implementation to using hrtimers whenever the poll period is in the same order
of magnitude as HZ's delta.

Any ideas/comments?

Regards,
Nicolas

[1] https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/3777#issuecomment-698346991

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Omap]

  Powered by Linux