> On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 01:39:16PM +0900, HyungJae Im wrote: > > Hello, This is Hyungjae Im from Samsung Electronics. > > Let me answer your questions inline. > > > > >On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 10:27:47PM +0900, HyungJae Im wrote: > > >> From: "hj2.im" <hj2.im@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > >> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 22:11:24 +0900 > > >> Subject: [PATCH v2] input: add 2 kind of switch > > > > > >Why is this in the body of that patch? > > > > I read "how to send your first kernel patch", but still making so many mistakes. > > I will be cautious with this. > > > > >> > > >> We need support to various accessories on the device, > > >> some switch does not exist in switch list. > > >> So added switch for the following purpose. > > >> > > >> SW_COVER_ATTACHED is for the checking the cover > > >> attached or not on the device. SW_EXT_PEN_ATTACHED is for the > > >> checking the external pen attached or not on the device > > > > > >You didn't answer the previous question as to why the existing values do > > >not work for you instead of having to create new ones? > > > > I think I should clarify this part the most for this review. > > As you know, new added events both has similar existing events, > > but it has to operate separately. > > > > First, SW_COVER_ATTACHED is similar with SW_MACHINE_COVER. > > We need two events for our cover interaction. > > One is to detect if flip cover is open/closed(covers screen or not), > > and one is for detecting if cover is attached(detect if device is put into cover). > > With the second event, we send event for attachment and start authentication > > distinguishing if it was Samsung made cover. > > > > Second, SW_EXT_PEN_ATTACHED detects if pen is attached externally on tablet models. > > It is different with SW_PEN_INSERTED since this is detecting pens like our NOTE series. > > SW_EXT_PEN_ATTACHED has an unique role to set wacom tuning table differently > > while pen is attached/detached. > > All of that needs to go in the changelog text for the individual patches > when you submit them. > > But as Dmitry pointed out, it doesn't look like either of these drivers > are needed at all, just use the gpio-keys driver instead. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Can you accept V1 patch? or need to add a change of device tree? Please let me know what do I do now.