11.09.2020 18:05, Dmitry Osipenko пишет: > 11.09.2020 17:50, Dmitry Osipenko пишет: > ... >>> @@ -626,6 +627,7 @@ static int __mxt_read_reg(struct i2c_client *client, >>> struct i2c_msg xfer[2]; >>> u8 buf[2]; >>> int ret; >>> + bool retry = false; > > Andy suggested to write this hunk like this: > > struct i2c_msg xfer[2]; > bool retry = false; > u8 buf[2]; > int ret; > > This is not a mandatory request at all, but it will make this particular > piece of code to look a bit nicer. > > There is also an opportunity to improve formatting of all variables by > sorting them by-length across the whole driver, this will improve > readability of the code. But of course it should be a separate patch. > Please note that I'm *not* saying that you should create this separate > patch! > I'd also recommend to rename the "retry" variable to "retried", which will be a more logical name (more proper English).
