On Wed, 26 Aug 2020, Sean O'Brien wrote: > > I actually believe we should follow the standard convention here, and have > > just one hid-<vendor> driver for all google products. Currently we have > > hid-google-hammer, and this would add hid-google-vivaldi. Would you (or > > Wei-Ning, CCing here) object on merging these two together? > > I'm a bit reluctant to merge them. Partly because I'm not familiar with > the hid-google-hammer driver, but mostly because this driver is intended > to handle non-google products which will use a google-defined usage code. > Perhaps I should drop "google" from the driver name? If it's known that it will be handling non-google products, then I think that's indeed the best option. Thanks in advance for v3 with this change, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs
