On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 07:51:01PM +0800, penghao wrote: > BYD Notebook built-in touch pad, USB interface,so disabled,the touch pad > device idVendor 0x0c45 idProduct 0x7056 > > Signed-off-by: penghao <penghao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c | 8 +++++++- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c > index 492dd641a25d..630a3cad211f 100644 > --- a/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c > +++ b/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c > @@ -1193,7 +1193,13 @@ static int usbhid_start(struct hid_device *hid) > interface->desc.bInterfaceProtocol == > USB_INTERFACE_PROTOCOL_KEYBOARD) { > usbhid_set_leds(hid); > - device_set_wakeup_enable(&dev->dev, 1); > + /* > + * USB HID: Add disabled touchpad wakeup on byd zhaoxin notebook > + */ > + if ((hid->vendor == 0x0c45) && (hid->product == 0x7056)) > + device_set_wakeup_enable(&dev->dev, 0); > + else > + device_set_wakeup_enable(&dev->dev, 1); Shouldn't this be a quirk somewhere instead of this core check? thanks, greg k-h