On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 02:26:00AM +0000, Michael Kelley wrote: > From: boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 6:52 PM > > > > On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 12:13:07AM +0000, Michael Kelley wrote: > > > From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2020 6:42 PM > > > > > > > > Hyper-V always use 4k page size (HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE), so when > > > > communicating with Hyper-V, a guest should always use HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE > > > > as the unit for page related data. For storvsc, the data is > > > > vmbus_packet_mpb_array. And since in scsi_cmnd, sglist of pages (in unit > > > > of PAGE_SIZE) is used, we need convert pages in the sglist of scsi_cmnd > > > > into Hyper-V pages in vmbus_packet_mpb_array. > > > > > > > > This patch does the conversion by dividing pages in sglist into Hyper-V > > > > pages, offset and indexes in vmbus_packet_mpb_array are recalculated > > > > accordingly. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------ > > > > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c > > > > index fb41636519ee..c54d25f279bc 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c > > > > @@ -1561,7 +1561,7 @@ static int storvsc_queuecommand(struct Scsi_Host *host, > > struct > > > > scsi_cmnd *scmnd) > > > > struct hv_host_device *host_dev = shost_priv(host); > > > > struct hv_device *dev = host_dev->dev; > > > > struct storvsc_cmd_request *cmd_request = scsi_cmd_priv(scmnd); > > > > - int i; > > > > + int i, j, k; > > > > struct scatterlist *sgl; > > > > unsigned int sg_count = 0; > > > > struct vmscsi_request *vm_srb; > > > > @@ -1569,6 +1569,8 @@ static int storvsc_queuecommand(struct Scsi_Host *host, > > struct > > > > scsi_cmnd *scmnd) > > > > struct vmbus_packet_mpb_array *payload; > > > > u32 payload_sz; > > > > u32 length; > > > > + int subpage_idx = 0; > > > > + unsigned int hvpg_count = 0; > > > > > > > > if (vmstor_proto_version <= VMSTOR_PROTO_VERSION_WIN8) { > > > > /* > > > > @@ -1643,23 +1645,36 @@ static int storvsc_queuecommand(struct Scsi_Host *host, > > struct > > > > scsi_cmnd *scmnd) > > > > payload_sz = sizeof(cmd_request->mpb); > > > > > > > > if (sg_count) { > > > > - if (sg_count > MAX_PAGE_BUFFER_COUNT) { > > > > + hvpg_count = sg_count * (PAGE_SIZE / HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE); > > > > > > The above calculation doesn't take into account the offset in the > > > first sglist or the overall length of the transfer, so the value of hvpg_count > > > could be quite a bit bigger than it needs to be. For example, with a 64K > > > page size and an 8 Kbyte transfer size that starts at offset 60K in the > > > first page, hvpg_count will be 32 when it really only needs to be 2. > > > > > > The nested loops below that populate the pfn_array take the > > > offset into account when starting, so that's good. But it will potentially > > > leave allocated entries unused. Furthermore, the nested loops could > > > terminate early when enough Hyper-V size pages are mapped to PFNs > > > based on the length of the transfer, even if all of the last guest size > > > page has not been mapped to PFNs. Like the offset at the beginning of > > > first guest size page in the sglist, there's potentially an unused portion > > > at the end of the last guest size page in the sglist. > > > > > > > Good point. I think we could calculate the exact hvpg_count as follow: > > > > hvpg_count = 0; > > cur_sgl = sgl; > > > > for (i = 0; i < sg_count; i++) { > > hvpg_count += HVPFN_UP(cur_sg->length) > > cur_sgl = sg_next(cur_sgl); > > } > > > > The downside would be going around that loop a lot of times when > the page size is 4K bytes and the I/O transfer size is something like > 256K bytes. I think this gives the right result in constant time: the > starting offset within a Hyper-V page, plus the transfer length, > rounded up to a Hyper-V page size, and divided by the Hyper-V > page size. > Ok, then: hvpg_offset = sgl->offset & ~HV_HYP_PAGE_MASK; hvpg_count = HVPFN_UP(hv_offset + length); ? Thanks! Regards, Boqun > > > > > + if (hvpg_count > MAX_PAGE_BUFFER_COUNT) { > > > > > > > > - payload_sz = (sg_count * sizeof(u64) + > > > > + payload_sz = (hvpg_count * sizeof(u64) + > > > > sizeof(struct vmbus_packet_mpb_array)); > > > > payload = kzalloc(payload_sz, GFP_ATOMIC); > > > > if (!payload) > > > > return SCSI_MLQUEUE_DEVICE_BUSY; > > > > } > > > > > > > > + /* > > > > + * sgl is a list of PAGEs, and payload->range.pfn_array > > > > + * expects the page number in the unit of HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE (the > > > > + * page size that Hyper-V uses, so here we need to divide PAGEs > > > > + * into HV_HYP_PAGE in case that PAGE_SIZE > HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE. > > > > + */ > > > > payload->range.len = length; > > > > - payload->range.offset = sgl[0].offset; > > > > + payload->range.offset = sgl[0].offset & ~HV_HYP_PAGE_MASK; > > > > + subpage_idx = sgl[0].offset >> HV_HYP_PAGE_SHIFT; > > > > > > > > cur_sgl = sgl; > > > > + k = 0; > > > > for (i = 0; i < sg_count; i++) { > > > > - payload->range.pfn_array[i] = > > > > - page_to_pfn(sg_page((cur_sgl))); > > > > + for (j = subpage_idx; j < (PAGE_SIZE / HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE); j++) { > > > > > > In the case where PAGE_SIZE == HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE, would it help the compiler > > > eliminate the loop if local variable j is declared as unsigned? In that case the test in the > > > for statement will always be false. > > > > > > > Good point! I did the following test: > > > > test.c: > > > > int func(unsigned int input, int *arr) > > { > > unsigned int i; > > int result = 0; > > > > for (i = input; i < 1; i++) > > result += arr[i]; > > > > return result; > > } > > > > if I define i as "int", I got: > > > > 0000000000000000 <func>: > > 0: 85 ff test %edi,%edi > > 2: 7f 2c jg 30 <func+0x30> > > 4: 48 63 d7 movslq %edi,%rdx > > 7: f7 df neg %edi > > 9: 45 31 c0 xor %r8d,%r8d > > c: 89 ff mov %edi,%edi > > e: 48 8d 04 96 lea (%rsi,%rdx,4),%rax > > 12: 48 01 d7 add %rdx,%rdi > > 15: 48 8d 54 be 04 lea 0x4(%rsi,%rdi,4),%rdx > > 1a: 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 nopw 0x0(%rax,%rax,1) > > 20: 44 03 00 add (%rax),%r8d > > 23: 48 83 c0 04 add $0x4,%rax > > 27: 48 39 d0 cmp %rdx,%rax > > 2a: 75 f4 jne 20 <func+0x20> > > 2c: 44 89 c0 mov %r8d,%eax > > 2f: c3 retq > > 30: 45 31 c0 xor %r8d,%r8d > > 33: 44 89 c0 mov %r8d,%eax > > 36: c3 retq > > > > and when I define i as "unsigned int", I got: > > > > 0000000000000000 <func>: > > 0: 85 ff test %edi,%edi > > 2: 75 03 jne 7 <func+0x7> > > 4: 8b 06 mov (%rsi),%eax > > 6: c3 retq > > 7: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax > > 9: c3 retq > > > > So clearly it helps, I will change this in the next version. > > Wow! The compiler is good .... > > > > > Regards, > > Boqun > > > > > > + payload->range.pfn_array[k] = > > > > + page_to_hvpfn(sg_page((cur_sgl))) + j; > > > > + k++; > > > > + } > > > > cur_sgl = sg_next(cur_sgl); > > > > + subpage_idx = 0; > > > > } > > > > } > > > > > > > > -- > > > > 2.27.0 > > >