Le sam. 18 avril 2020 à 0:42, Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 12:18 AM Paul Cercueil <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Le sam. 18 avril 2020 à 0:13, Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 12:05 AM Paul Cercueil
<paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>> Le ven. 17 avril 2020 à 23:59, Andy Shevchenko
>> <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
>> > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:21 PM Artur Rojek
>> <contact@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> >> + irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>> >
>> > Before it worked w/o IRQ, here is a regression you introduced.
>>
>> Before it simply did not need the IRQ, which is provided by the
>> devicetree anyway. No regression here.
>
> Does it work without IRQ? Or it was a dead code till now?
> For me it's clear regression. Otherwise something is really wrong
in a
> process of development of this driver.
Nothing wrong here. The IRQ was not used by the driver for the
functionality it provided before. It is required now to support the
touchscreen channels.
This is exactly what's wrong.
Previous DTS for my (hypothetical) case has no IRQ defined. Everything
works, right?
Now, due to this change it breaks my setup. Don't you see the problem?
The IRQ has been provided by every concerned DTS file since the
introduction of this driver and the related bindings, even though it
was not used by the driver.
-Paul
>> >> + if (irq < 0) {
>> >
>> >> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to get irq: %d\n",
irq);
>> >
>> > Redundant message.
>> >
>> >> + return irq;
>> >> + }
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
