02.04.2020 17:00, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
> 02.04.2020 16:24, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
>> 02.04.2020 14:50, Wang, Jiada пишет:
>>> Hi Dmitry
>>>
>>> On 2020/04/02 1:04, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>> 31.03.2020 13:50, Jiada Wang пишет:
>>>>> From: Sanjeev Chugh <sanjeev_chugh@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>
>>>>> There could be scope of race conditions when sysfs is being handled
>>>>> and at the same time, device removal is occurring. For example,
>>>>> we don't want the device removal to begin if the Atmel device
>>>>> cfg update is going on or firmware update is going on. In such
>>>>> cases, wait for device update to be completed before the removal
>>>>> continues.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thread Thread 2:
>>>>> =========================
>>>>> =========================
>>>>> mxt_update_fw_store() mxt_remove()
>>>>> mutex_lock(&data->lock) ...
>>>>> mxt_initialize() //Tries to acquire lock
>>>>> request_firmware_nowait() mutex_lock(&data->lock)
>>>>> ... ==>waits for lock()
>>>>> ... .
>>>>> ... .
>>>>> mutex_unlock(&data->lock) .
>>>>> //Gets lock and
>>>>> proceeds
>>>>>
>>>>> mxt_free_input_device();
>>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> mutex_unlock(&data->lock)
>>>>> //Frees atmel driver
>>>>> data
>>>>> kfree(data)
>>>>>
>>>>> If the request_firmware_nowait() completes after the driver removal,
>>>>> and callback is triggered. But kernel crashes since the module is
>>>>> already removed.
>>>>>
>>>>> This commit adds state machine to serialize such scenarios.
>>>>
>>>> Won't it be easier to bump driver's module use-count by __module_get()
>>>> while firmware is updating? Or remove sysfs during of mxt_remove()? >
>>>
>>> thanks for your inspiration, I will replace state machine with module
>>> use-count.
>>
>> I'm actually now thinking that the suggestion about the module-count
>> wasn't very correct because this won't really help in regards to
>> mxt_update_fw_store() / mxt_remove() racing.
>>
>> I see that mxt_remove() already invokes the mxt_sysfs_remove(), which
>> should block until mxt_update_fw_store() is completed, shouldn't it?
>>
>> I guess the kfree(data) isn't the real cause of the problem and
>> something like this should help:
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/atmel_mxt_ts.c
>> b/drivers/input/touchscreen/atmel_mxt_ts.c
>> index b2edf51e1595..4e66106feeb9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/atmel_mxt_ts.c
>> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/atmel_mxt_ts.c
>> @@ -4254,6 +4254,7 @@ static void mxt_sysfs_remove(struct mxt_data *data)
>> struct i2c_client *client = data->client;
>>
>> sysfs_remove_group(&client->dev.kobj, &mxt_attr_group);
>> + sysfs_remove_group(&client->dev.kobj, &mxt_fw_attr_group);
>> }
>>
>> static void mxt_reset_slots(struct mxt_data *data)
>> @@ -4649,31 +4650,19 @@ static int mxt_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>> {
>> struct mxt_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>>
>> - mutex_lock(&data->lock);
>> - if (data->e_state == MXT_STATE_UPDATING_CONFIG_ASYNC ||
>> - data->e_state == MXT_STATE_UPDATING_CONFIG) {
>> - data->e_state = MXT_STATE_GOING_AWAY;
>> - mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
>> - mxt_wait_for_completion(data, &data->update_cfg_completion,
>> - MXT_CONFIG_TIMEOUT);
>> - } else {
>> - data->e_state = MXT_STATE_GOING_AWAY;
>> - mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
>> - }
>> + mxt_sysfs_remove(data);
>>
>> - disable_irq(data->irq);
>> - sysfs_remove_group(&client->dev.kobj, &mxt_fw_attr_group);
>> if (data->reset_gpio) {
>> sysfs_remove_link(&client->dev.kobj, "reset");
>> gpiod_unexport(data->reset_gpio);
>> }
>> +
>> mxt_debug_msg_remove(data);
>> - mxt_sysfs_remove(data);
>> mxt_free_input_device(data);
>> mxt_free_object_table(data);
>>
>> if (debug_state)
>> cancel_delayed_work_sync(&data->watchdog_work);
>> + disable_irq(data->irq);
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>
> I'm looking at this again and the original tear-down order of the
> mxt_remove() looks okay, so no need to change it.
>
> Reading the commit message, it says that request_firmware_nowait() races
> with kfree(data), but that can't happen because the data is
> resource-managed and request_firmware_nowait() bumps device's use-count.
>
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.6.2/source/drivers/base/firmware_loader/main.c#L1043
>
> I think this patch was ported from some very old kernel version and it's
> simply not applicable to the upstream anymore.
>
Moreover, request_firmware_nowait() uses try_module_get(), hence
driver's module can't be unloaded until firmware is loaded. This patch
is wrong, please drop it.
