Hi Filipe,
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 5:23 AM Filipe Laíns <lains@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> When exporting all other types of report descriptors we print a debug
> message. Not doing so for HID++ descriptors makes unaware users think
> that no HID++ descriptor was exported.
Unless I am mistaken, those dbg_hid() calls are not displayed by
default on any distribution. So I am not sure what is the benefit to
add this one here when we are already not showing the rest to the
users by default. There is a tiny improvement to have some code
symmetry, but here, honestly, it doesn't feel that required.
Cheers,
Benjamin
>
> Signed-off-by: Filipe Laíns <lains@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c
> index cc7fc71d8b05..8f17a29b5a94 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c
> @@ -1368,6 +1368,8 @@ static int logi_dj_ll_parse(struct hid_device *hid)
> }
>
> if (djdev->reports_supported & HIDPP) {
> + dbg_hid("%s: sending a HID++ descriptor, reports_supported: %llx\n",
> + __func__, djdev->reports_supported);
> rdcat(rdesc, &rsize, hidpp_descriptor,
> sizeof(hidpp_descriptor));
> }
> --
> 2.24.1
>
