On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 10:06:09AM +0200, Marco Felsch wrote: > On 19-09-17 10:26, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 07:18:14PM +0200, Marco Felsch wrote: > > > On 19-09-17 10:07, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > What I was trying to say is that I have not actually seen DTB that is > > part of hardware or separately upgradable frimware (not talking about > > ppc or sparc boxes, but ones that might be using this driver). It is > > always built into the kernel in my experience, so backward compatibility > > is simply a tool that is being used to prevent us from being too wild > > with hacking on bindings, but rarely a practical concern. > > Thanks, now I got you :) > > > In cases like this I think it is worthwhile to simply update in-tree > > DTS and arrive at a sane binding. > > I'm with you, should we wait for Rob's ack before we go this way? I also support this way. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
