RE: [PATCH 1/2] HID: intel-ish-hid: fix wrong type conversion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Wed, 2019-05-29 at 12:38 -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-05-29 at 19:03 +0000, Yang, Hyungwoo wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 2019-05-29 at 07:21 +0000, Yang, Hyungwoo wrote:
> > > > > > > On Tue, 2019-05-28 at 14:36 -0700, Hyungwoo Yang wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > What was symptom or problem you try to address? Is there any 
> > > > > > crash or bug occurred? Does it happen with the mainline 
> > > > > > kernel?
> > > > > 
> > > > > I've added the detail in commit message in v2. Basically due to 
> > > > > wrong usage of driver_data of ishtp client device, we see kernel 
> > > > > crash.
> > > > > Currently driver_data is set by bus driver which is wrong since 
> > > > > driver_data should be owned by corresponding device driver.
> > > > > Right
> > > > > now,
> > > > > we see kernel crash during suspend() of cros_ec_ishtp. Yes, it 
> > > > > happens with the mainline kernel since cros_ec_ishtp is already 
> > > > > upstreamed.
> > > > 
> > > > Technically this driver is not mainline. It will go in 5.3.
> > > > 
> > > > The problem is  cros_ec ish driver is overriding driver_data "
> > > > 	client_data->ec_dev = ec_dev;
> > > > 	dev->driver_data = ec_dev;
> > > > "
> > > > The client drivers own the driver data in its "struct 
> > > > ishtp_cl_device *" not the struct device *.
> > > 
> > > No. still driver_data in "struct device" should be owned by its 
> > > device driver. So there's no problem here since cros_ec_ish driver 
> > > is owner of the device.
> > 
> > I don't know how the driver was submitted without suspend/resume test.
> > 
> > Spilt the patch in this for bisect and the cros-ec is not in 5.2 yet.
> > 
> > The first patch, is the combination of patch 1 and patch 2 excluding 
> > cros-ec changes.
> > 
> > The second patch for cros-ec only using the new API.
> 
> Also run
> ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl on the patches
> 
> to get maintainers/mailing list to send/copy. This patch probably needs to go along with cros-ec drivers pull request.

Thank you, there was some mistake in sending patches but anyway like you said,
I've submitted a patch combining patch1 and patch2 without cros-ec-ishtp. and also submitted one for cros-ec-ishtp.

Thanks,
Hyungwoo




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Omap]

  Powered by Linux