On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 9:30 PM Jiri Kosina <jikos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Apr 2019, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > > > >Ronald (Cc-ed) raised quite a good point: > > >what's the benefit of removing the error message if this function (and > > >__extract) can only report an unsigned 32 bits value? > > > > I didn’t spot this, sorry. > > > > > > > >My take is we should revert 94a9992f7dbdfb28976b upstream and think at > > >a better solution. > > > > I think using a new fix to replace it will be a better approach, as it at > > least partially solves the issue. > > Guys, did this fall in between cracks? Is anyone planning to send a fixup? > Kai-Heng, have you been able to work on that? Cheers, Benjamin
