On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 03:21:10PM +0100, Rodrigo Rivas Costa wrote: > On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 09:42:52PM -0300, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote: > > - if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&request->done, 30 * HZ)) { > > + if (!wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(&request->done, > > + 30 * HZ)) { > > retval = -ETIMEDOUT; > > goto out; > > } > > Now this function can succeed or fail because of ETIMEDOUT or an > interrupt. I think you should return -EINTR or maybe -ESYSRESTART if > interrupted. Rodrigo, you are right. Marcos, could you please send updated patch that returns different error code for timeout vs interrupt condition? I dropped the patch for now. Thanks. -- Dmitry