Hi Dmitry, On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 5:46 PM Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > We should be using flush_delayed_work() instead of flush_work() in > matrix_keypad_stop() to ensure that we are not missing work that is > scheduled but not yet put in the workqueue (i.e. its delay timer has not > expired yet). > Could the following scenario cause a use-after-free? (I am adding comments on lines starting with -->) a) user closes the device handle: static void matrix_keypad_stop(struct input_dev *dev) { struct matrix_keypad *keypad = input_get_drvdata(dev); spin_lock_irq(&keypad->lock); keypad->stopped = true; spin_unlock_irq(&keypad->lock); flush_work(&keypad->work.work); --> --> new interrupt comes in, and schedules new delayed keypad->work (1) --> /* * matrix_keypad_scan() will leave IRQs enabled; * we should disable them now. */ disable_row_irqs(keypad); } b) user removes the keypad, or unloads the module: static int matrix_keypad_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct matrix_keypad *keypad = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); matrix_keypad_free_gpio(keypad); input_unregister_device(keypad->input_dev); kfree(keypad); --> --> delayed keypad->work scheduled at (1) above executes anywhere past here, --> and causes a user-after-free. --> return 0; }