Re: [PATCH] HID: sony: Fix SHANWAN PS3 GamePad rumbling on USB again

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 10:26:14 +0800
liquid <outmatch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> >From 6323ffb83e23eab9a08208063f9dba27c6a0d228 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Hongye Yuan <outmatch@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2018 09:41:23 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] HID: sony: Fix SHANWAN PS3 GamePad rumbling on USB again
> 
> - The SHANWAN DS3 clone joystick requires HID Output Reports via Interrupt EP.
> - Added a quirk for SHANWAN PS3 GamePad.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hongye Yuan <outmatch@xxxxxxxxx>

Hi Hongye,

I am CCing Roderick Colenbrander who is the de-facto hid-sony
maintainer. Maybe Roderick should be mentioned in MAINTAINERS.

I guess you can skip linux-usb and Greg on the next iteration to spare
them some traffic.

Please consider using "git send-email" to send patches created with "git
format-patch" to avoid problems with formatting, for instance I don't
see any TABs in the patch below, all TABs seem to have been converted to
spaces and the patch does not apply.

Make sure to use ./scripts/checkpatch.pl to spot other problems.

Some other minor comments are inlined below.

> ---
>  drivers/hid/hid-sony.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-sony.c b/drivers/hid/hid-sony.c
> index 9671a4bad643..842f370cfec2 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-sony.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-sony.c
> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@
>  #define FUTUREMAX_DANCE_MAT       BIT(13)
>  #define NSG_MR5U_REMOTE_BT        BIT(14)
>  #define NSG_MR7U_REMOTE_BT        BIT(15)
> +#define SHANWAN_GAMEPAD           BIT(16)
>
>  #define SIXAXIS_CONTROLLER (SIXAXIS_CONTROLLER_USB | SIXAXIS_CONTROLLER_BT)
>  #define MOTION_CONTROLLER (MOTION_CONTROLLER_USB | MOTION_CONTROLLER_BT)
> @@ -1490,6 +1491,7 @@ static int sony_register_sensors(struct sony_sc *sc)
>   */
>  static int sixaxis_set_operational_usb(struct hid_device *hdev)
>  {
> +    struct sony_sc *sc = hid_get_drvdata(hdev);
>      const int buf_size =
>          max(SIXAXIS_REPORT_0xF2_SIZE, SIXAXIS_REPORT_0xF5_SIZE);
>      u8 *buf;
> @@ -1521,7 +1523,7 @@ static int sixaxis_set_operational_usb(struct
> hid_device *hdev)
>       * But the USB interrupt would cause SHANWAN controllers to
>       * start rumbling non-stop.
>       */
> -    if (strcmp(hdev->name, "SHANWAN PS3 GamePad")) {
> +    if (sc->quirks & SHANWAN_GAMEPAD) {

I think you are inverting the logic here, the original test meant to
check that the controller was NOT a "SHANWAN PS3 GamePad" before doing
step 3.

Maybe this can be made more explicit with the change below (ideally in
a preliminary patch):

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-sony.c b/drivers/hid/hid-sony.c
index 9671a4bad643..949305cfa199 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-sony.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-sony.c
@@ -1519,14 +1519,15 @@ static int sixaxis_set_operational_usb(struct hid_device *hdev)
 
 	/*
 	 * But the USB interrupt would cause SHANWAN controllers to
-	 * start rumbling non-stop.
+	 * start rumbling non-stop, so skip step 3 for these controllers.
 	 */
-	if (strcmp(hdev->name, "SHANWAN PS3 GamePad")) {
-		ret = hid_hw_output_report(hdev, buf, 1);
-		if (ret < 0) {
-			hid_info(hdev, "can't set operational mode: step 3, ignoring\n");
-			ret = 0;
-		}
+	if (!strcmp(hdev->name, "SHANWAN PS3 GamePad"))
+		goto out;
+
+	ret = hid_hw_output_report(hdev, buf, 1);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		hid_info(hdev, "can't set operational mode: step 3, ignoring\n");
+		ret = 0;
 	}
 
 out:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Unfortunately I cannot test it.

After that change you can check for (sc->quirks & SHANWAN_GAMEPAD) in
your patch.

>          ret = hid_hw_output_report(hdev, buf, 1);
>          if (ret < 0) {
>              hid_info(hdev, "can't set operational mode: step 3, ignoring\n");
> @@ -2097,9 +2099,13 @@ static void sixaxis_send_output_report(struct
> sony_sc *sc)
>          }
>      }
> 
> -    hid_hw_raw_request(sc->hdev, report->report_id, (u8 *)report,
> -            sizeof(struct sixaxis_output_report),
> -            HID_OUTPUT_REPORT, HID_REQ_SET_REPORT);
> +    /* SHANWAN controllers require sending output reports via intr channel */
> +    if (sc->quirks & SHANWAN_GAMEPAD)
> +        hid_hw_output_report(sc->hdev, (u8 *)report,
> +                sizeof(struct sixaxis_output_report));
> +    else hid_hw_raw_request(sc->hdev, report->report_id, (u8 *)report,
> +                sizeof(struct sixaxis_output_report),
> +                HID_OUTPUT_REPORT, HID_REQ_SET_REPORT);

The body of the else condition needs to go on a new line, with an extra
indentation level.

Also, this makes me wonder if the problem might be about HID quirks, can
you try playing with hdev->quirks settings in sony_input_configured()?

Ciao,
   Antonio

>  }
> 
>  static void dualshock4_send_output_report(struct sony_sc *sc)
> @@ -2811,6 +2817,9 @@ static int sony_probe(struct hid_device *hdev,
> const struct hid_device_id *id)
>      if (!strcmp(hdev->name, "FutureMax Dance Mat"))
>          quirks |= FUTUREMAX_DANCE_MAT;
> 
> +    if (!strcmp(hdev->name, "SHANWAN PS3 GamePad"))
> +        quirks |= SHANWAN_GAMEPAD;
> +
>      sc = devm_kzalloc(&hdev->dev, sizeof(*sc), GFP_KERNEL);
>      if (sc == NULL) {
>          hid_err(hdev, "can't alloc sony descriptor\n");
> -- 
> 2.20.1


-- 
Antonio Ospite
https://ao2.it
https://twitter.com/ao2it

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
   See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Omap]

  Powered by Linux