On Sat 2018-12-15 11:12:21, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 10:47:22AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > > b) would it be acceptable if done properly? (cmd line option to > > > > enable, avoiding duplicate/wrong events?) > > > > > > Well, for one, you shouldn't be using a timer, all the debouncing can be > > > done by math on the event timestamps. > > > > Not... really, right? You need to send an release some time after > > button indicates release if bounce did not happen. It is similar to > > autorepeat needing a timer. > > You can send the first release and ignore all presses and releases in a > time window after that. I could, and it would work for glitches on release, but that would do very bad things if switch glitched on press, right? "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XX " -> "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX " ... ok "XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX..." -> "XX ..." ... bad idea. [Maybe could be detected with "XX " being unusually short?] But I believe I see "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX" on X220 device, too. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
