On Sat, 27 Oct 2018, Linus Torvalds wrote: > I *think* the problem is that the i2c_hid_dmi_desc_override_table[] > isn't terminated by a NULL entry, and I will test that next. Hm, that almost certainly is indeed the issue, thanks a lot for reporting it. > What makes me *very* unhappy about this is that if I'm right, I think it > means that code was literally not tested at all by anybody who didn't > have one of the entries in that list. Honestly, my autotesting of HID tree is running on HW that doesn't have i2c transport at all, only USB a Bluetooth. Something to improve I guess; will fix that next week. Benjamin, do you have something for that in place already? Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs
