Hi Lee, On Wednesday 25 July 2018 10:56 AM, Lee Jones wrote: [...] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Vignesh R (5): >>>>>>> mfd: ti_am335x_tscadc: Don't mark TSCADC MFD as wakeup capable >>>>>>> Input: ti_am335x_tsc: Mark TSC device as wakeup source >>>>>>> mfd: ti_am335x_tscadc: Keep ADC interface on if child is wakeup >>>>>>> capable >>>>>>> iio: adc: ti_am335x_adc: Disable ADC during suspend unconditionally >>>>>>> Input: ti_am335x_tsc: Mark IRQ as wakeup capable >>>>>>> >>>>>>> drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c | 12 ++++-------- >>>>>>> drivers/input/touchscreen/ti_am335x_tsc.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++----- >>>>>>> drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c | 14 +++++++++++++- >>>>>>> 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Gentle ping... Could you review/pick this series? MFD amd IIO bits are >>>>>> already ACKed >>>>> >>>>> MFD patches are reviewed "for my own reference" meaning that we >>>>> haven't yet agreed on a merge plan yet. >>>> >>>> I think this series makes sense to be pushed through a single tree as >>>> opposed to being spread between 3, even if it could technically be >>>> possible. It looks like Jonathan is fine with going it through either >>>> his or some other tree, I am fine with it going through MFD. >>> >>> I'm happy either way. >>> >> Thanks Dmitry, Jonathan and Lee Jones! >> >> Could this be applied to one of the trees now? MFD perhaps? > > It'll be applied, when it's applied. ;) I see that this series was not picked up for v4.19. Could you consider this series for v4.20? Patches apply cleanly against linux-next. -- Regards Vignesh
