On Mon, 2018-07-23 at 10:13 -0700, dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 04:20:50PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Mon, 2018-07-23 at 16:18 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Mon, 2018-07-23 at 15:03 +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote: > > > > That function already bails out if x86_platform.legacy.i8042 == > > > > X86_LEGACY_I8042_PLATFORM_ABSENT. The check could either be > > > > amended with "|| x86_apple_machine" > > > > In any case this suggestion seems to be the best to cover any Mac:s. > > If > > ACPI already has it disabled — we are fine, otherwise bail out based > > on > > DMI check. > > Why would one run with ACPI disabled? > I do not think we should be > supporting this [mis-]configuration... The comment was about the bit in FADT table which reflects the i8042 presence on platform in the question. You can't for sure check that bit if ACPI is disabled. By the way, I didn't tell anything about ACPI being disabled, sorry for confusion. -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Intel Finland Oy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
