On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 02:44:19PM +0300, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: > On 04/19/2018 02:25 PM, Juergen Gross wrote: > > On 18/04/18 17:04, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: > > > From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@xxxxxxxx> > > > > > > It is now only possible to control if multi-touch virtual device > > > is created or not (via the corresponding XenStore entries), > > > but keyboard and pointer devices are always created. > > Why don't you want to go that route for keyboard and mouse, too? > > Or does this really make no sense? > Well, I would prefer not to touch anything outside Linux and > this driver. And these settings seem to be implementation specific. > So, this is why introduce Linux module parameters and don't extend > the kbdif protocol. Why do you consider this implementation specific? How other guests decide to forego creation of relative pointer device or keyboard-like device? You already have "features" for absolute pointing device and multitouch, so please extend the protocol properly so you indeed do not code something implementation-specific (i.e. module parameters). Thanks. -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
