Hi, 2018-02-13 19:25 GMT+01:00 Brian Norris <briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Hi Enric, > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 11:40:44AM +0100, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote: >> On 12/02/18 23:13, Brian Norris wrote: >> > On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 07:09:05PM +0800, Jeffy Chen wrote: >> >> Add support for specifying event actions to trigger wakeup when using >> >> the gpio-keys input device as a wakeup source. >> >> >> >> This would allow the device to configure when to wakeup the system. For >> >> example a gpio-keys input device for pen insert, may only want to wakeup >> >> the system when ejecting the pen. >> >> >> >> Suggested-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> --- >> >> >> >> Changes in v2: >> >> Specify wakeup event action instead of irq trigger type as Brian >> >> suggested. > [...] >> Not sure if you were aware but there is also some discussion related to this, >> maybe we can join the efforts? >> >> v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10208261/ >> v2: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10211147/ > > Thanks for the pointers. IIUC, that's talking about a different problem: > how to utilize a GPIO key in level-triggered mode. That touches similar > code, but it doesn't really have anything to do with configuring a > different wakeup trigger type. > Right, sorry. I see now what you are doing. > The two patches would need to be reconciled, if they both are going to > be merged. But otherwise, I think they're perfectly fine to be separate. > Yes, that's why I got confused, I had those patches applied on my tree and when I tried to apply these failed and I wrongly assumed that were doing the same. Waiting to test the third version ;) Thanks, Enric > Brian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
