On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 04:43:37PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> A helper purported to look up a child node based on its name was using
> the wrong of-helper and ended up prematurely freeing the parent of-node
> while searching the whole device tree depth-first starting at the parent
> node.
Ugh, this all is pretty ugly business. Can we teach MFD to allow
specifying firmware node to be attached to the platform devices it
creates in mfd_add_device() so that the leaf drivers simply call
device_property_read_XXX() on their own device and not be bothered with
weird OF refcount issues or what node they need to locate and parse?
Thanks!
>
> Fixes: 64b9e4d803b1 ("input: twl4030-vibra: Support for DT booted kernel")
> Fixes: e661d0a04462 ("Input: twl4030-vibra - fix ERROR: Bad of_node_put() warning")
> Cc: stable <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 3.7
> Cc: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Marek Belisko <marek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/input/misc/twl4030-vibra.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/twl4030-vibra.c b/drivers/input/misc/twl4030-vibra.c
> index 6c51d404874b..c37aea9ac272 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/misc/twl4030-vibra.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/twl4030-vibra.c
> @@ -178,12 +178,14 @@ static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(twl4030_vibra_pm_ops,
> twl4030_vibra_suspend, twl4030_vibra_resume);
>
> static bool twl4030_vibra_check_coexist(struct twl4030_vibra_data *pdata,
> - struct device_node *node)
> + struct device_node *parent)
> {
> + struct device_node *node;
> +
> if (pdata && pdata->coexist)
> return true;
>
> - node = of_find_node_by_name(node, "codec");
> + node = of_get_child_by_name(parent, "codec");
> if (node) {
> of_node_put(node);
> return true;
> --
> 2.15.0
>
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
