Fix child-node lookup during probe, which ended up searching the whole
device tree depth-first starting at parent rather than just matching on
its children.
Later sanity checks on node properties (which would likely be missing)
should prevent this from causing much trouble however, especially as the
original premature free of the parent node has already been fixed
separately (but that "fix" was apparently never backported to stable).
Fixes: e7ec014a47e4 ("Input: twl6040-vibra - update for device tree support")
Fixes: c52c545ead97 ("Input: twl6040-vibra - fix DT node memory management")
Cc: stable <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 3.6
Cc: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@xxxxxx>
Cc: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/input/misc/twl6040-vibra.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/twl6040-vibra.c b/drivers/input/misc/twl6040-vibra.c
index 5690eb7ff954..15e0d352c4cc 100644
--- a/drivers/input/misc/twl6040-vibra.c
+++ b/drivers/input/misc/twl6040-vibra.c
@@ -248,8 +248,7 @@ static int twl6040_vibra_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
int vddvibr_uV = 0;
int error;
- of_node_get(twl6040_core_dev->of_node);
- twl6040_core_node = of_find_node_by_name(twl6040_core_dev->of_node,
+ twl6040_core_node = of_get_child_by_name(twl6040_core_dev->of_node,
"vibra");
if (!twl6040_core_node) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "parent of node is missing?\n");
--
2.15.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
