Re: [PATCH resend v2 2/2] Input: soc_button_array - Suppress power button presses during suspend

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Oct 11 2017 or thereabouts, Hans de Goede wrote:
> If the power-button is pressed to wakeup the laptop/tablet from suspend
> and we report a KEY_POWER event to userspace when woken up this will cause
> userspace to immediately suspend the system again which is undesirable.
> 
> This commit sets the new no_wakeup_events flag in the gpio_keys_button
> struct for the power-button suppressing the undesirable KEY_POWER input
> events on wake-up.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> -New patch in v2 of this patch-set
> ---
>  drivers/input/misc/soc_button_array.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/soc_button_array.c b/drivers/input/misc/soc_button_array.c
> index 23520df7650f..0f7cce70f748 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/misc/soc_button_array.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/soc_button_array.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ struct soc_button_info {
>  	unsigned int event_code;
>  	bool autorepeat;
>  	bool wakeup;
> +	bool no_wakeup_events;
>  };
>  
>  /*
> @@ -100,6 +101,7 @@ soc_button_device_create(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  		gpio_keys[n_buttons].active_low = 1;
>  		gpio_keys[n_buttons].desc = info->name;
>  		gpio_keys[n_buttons].wakeup = info->wakeup;
> +		gpio_keys[n_buttons].no_wakeup_events = info->no_wakeup_events;

This is an API problem in gpio_keys.c, but reading it here makes me
think "this button will never send wakeup events", so it will not wake
up the system. Can't we find a more explicit name?

>  		/* These devices often use cheap buttons, use 50 ms debounce */
>  		gpio_keys[n_buttons].debounce_interval = 50;
>  		n_buttons++;
> @@ -185,6 +187,7 @@ static int soc_button_parse_btn_desc(struct device *dev,
>  		info->name = "power";
>  		info->event_code = KEY_POWER;
>  		info->wakeup = true;
> +		info->no_wakeup_events = true;
>  	} else if (upage == 0x07 && usage == 0xe3) {
>  		info->name = "home";
>  		info->event_code = KEY_LEFTMETA;
> @@ -369,7 +372,7 @@ static int soc_button_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   * Platforms"
>   */
>  static struct soc_button_info soc_button_PNP0C40[] = {
> -	{ "power", 0, EV_KEY, KEY_POWER, false, true },
> +	{ "power", 0, EV_KEY, KEY_POWER, false, true, true },
>  	{ "home", 1, EV_KEY, KEY_LEFTMETA, false, true },

I think we might as well explicitly set the values to false for the
others, or use an explicit assignment in the whole list.

Cheers,
Benjamin

>  	{ "volume_up", 2, EV_KEY, KEY_VOLUMEUP, true, false },
>  	{ "volume_down", 3, EV_KEY, KEY_VOLUMEDOWN, true, false },
> -- 
> 2.14.2
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Omap]

  Powered by Linux