Hi, On 09/17/2017 07:50 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > >>>> Do you think such an improvement could be harmful in some way, >>>> even if it was made optional? >>> >>> Of course, we can make LED timing accurate down to microseconds. It will >>> mean increased overhead -- for "improvement" human can not perceive. >>> >>> If someone has problems with LED delays not being accurate enough... we >>> may want to fix it. But that is not the case here, is it? >> >> AFAIR David was mentioning that the hr_timer support is perceivable > > He said that hr_timer support is perceivable _when he is driving > vibration motor_. Which he should not do in the first place. > > Yes, if the difference is perceivable with LED in non-crazy > configuration (*), we can take the patch. Is it? Do we have someone > not from Google observing it? > > Pavel > (*) emulating PWM using blink trigger counts as "crazy" :-) How about adding CONFIG_LED_TRIGGERS_HR_TIMER_SUPPORT, guarding the hr timer support in triggers (timer trigger could also benefit from it) with it, and adding "(EXPERIMENTAL)" tag to the config description? -- Best regards, Jacek Anaszewski -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
