On 08/17/2017 08:25 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 07:01:54PM -0700, Roderick Colenbrander wrote: >> From: Roderick Colenbrander <roderick.colenbrander@xxxxxxxx> >> >> This new property can be set on subdevices part of a composite >> input device. The purpose of the constant is to notify other >> kernel components (e.g. joydev) and user space that a device is >> a composite device. >> >> Signed-off-by: Roderick Colenbrander <roderick.colenbrander@xxxxxxxx> >> --- >> Documentation/input/event-codes.rst | 12 ++++++++++++ >> include/uapi/linux/input-event-codes.h | 1 + >> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/input/event-codes.rst b/Documentation/input/event-codes.rst >> index a8c0873..d56a32e 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/input/event-codes.rst >> +++ b/Documentation/input/event-codes.rst >> @@ -356,6 +356,18 @@ can report through the rotational axes (absolute and/or relative rx, ry, rz). >> All other axes retain their meaning. A device must not mix >> regular directional axes and accelerometer axes on the same event node. >> >> +INPUT_PROP_COMPOSITE >> +-------------------- >> + >> +The functionality of some advanced input devices is exposed through several >> +event devices. For example a gamepad with motion sensors could be exposed as >> +a gamepad device with axes / buttons and a separate motion sensor device. >> + >> +The INPUT_PROP_COMPOSITE flag is set on all sub devices making up a larger >> +composite device. This flag allows user space applications in addition to >> +other kernel drivers (e.g. joydev) to easily determine whether a device >> +is part of a composite device. > > honestly, I would love for this to be paired with an ioctl that can give me > the sysnames of the other devices. Or (probably safer) just a unique > number/string that all composite devices share. I agree enumerating composite devices is a pain, which requires looping over all evdev nodes and attempting to stitch them together based on ioctl return info or by manually scanning sysfs. On a sidenote, the process of finding sysfs node for a device as this often needed too for e.g. LEDs and device specific options is tricky too and could use improvements. I'm trying to envision how a new ioctl for composite device enumeration would work. Even right now there are already fun race conditions as the composite devices come up in different order just, because they completed initialization at slightly different times. Maybe there would be some 'evdev device group' concept with each evdev node storing this unique id. This would map to a unique location in sysfs, which contains the list of devices? The ioctl would just be used to query this id? > > That way I can reassemble this in userspace. We already do something like > this for the libinput device groups and I think just having the input > property isn't quite enough. We can already guess a lot of this from the > PHYS attributes but there are several devices where having this filled by > the kernel is going to be useful. Wacom devices for example where the pen > and touch device don't share the same pid. I'm not too familiar with the Wacom devices, the composite device show up as different devices on a bus (e.g. USB / Bluetooth / ..) or is there a single physical device, but the driver somehow exposes different sub devices through some vendor specific method? > > Right now, it's a bit too simple - all this flag gives me is the > notification that I have to start looking for other devices. Works fine with > one composited device connected, but once you look at more than that it > doesn't seem to be overly useful. I understand a more sophisticated solution is desired and we don't help creating that. For us the original problem was that we expose dualshock 3 / 4 subdevices in recent kernels for which the subdevices got picked up by joydev. We proposed code to limit accelerometer devices, but during review it was felt that the code didn't narrow it down enough. We felt joydev would cause issues for users and then recently we had this reddit thread (https://www.reddit.com/r/linux_gaming/comments/6rxhj8/what_happened_with_the_dualshock_4_and_the_new/) with complaining users (SDL2 we took care of last year, but they still haven't released 2.0.6 yet). Since 4.13 or 4.14 will be used in a lot of upcoming distributions, we like to consider at least getting this initial part in, if it is considered to be a stepping stone towards the full solution of adding an ioctl as well. > > Cheers, > Peter > > >> + >> Guidelines >> ========== >> >> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/input-event-codes.h b/include/uapi/linux/input-event-codes.h >> index 1798910..da3fa83 100644 >> --- a/include/uapi/linux/input-event-codes.h >> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/input-event-codes.h >> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ >> #define INPUT_PROP_TOPBUTTONPAD 0x04 /* softbuttons at top of pad */ >> #define INPUT_PROP_POINTING_STICK 0x05 /* is a pointing stick */ >> #define INPUT_PROP_ACCELEROMETER 0x06 /* has accelerometer */ >> +#define INPUT_PROP_COMPOSITE 0x07 /* is part of a composite device */ >> >> #define INPUT_PROP_MAX 0x1f >> #define INPUT_PROP_CNT (INPUT_PROP_MAX + 1) >> -- >> 2.9.4 > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
