Yeah I noticed that, sorry if my response wasn't very clear! Should probably wait to have my morning coffee before responding to these messages :P On Mon, 2017-07-24 at 21:28 +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Mon, 24 Jul 2017, Lyude Paul wrote: > > > > > So, call hid_hw_open() in rmi_post_resume() so we make sure > > > > that > > > > the > > > > device is alive before we try talking to it. > > > > > > > > This fixes RMI device suspend/resume over HID. > > > > - int ret; > > > > + int ret = 0; > > > > > > What's the point? > > > > So that we can use the same out: label at the end of the function > > that > > calls hid_hw_close() to return success. This being said though I > > just > > realized that setting ret will initialize it to 0 anyway, so I > > guess > > this can be dropped > > Andy's point was that hid_hw_open() is obviously re-initializing the > ret > before its first use as a return value, so there is no need to > initialize > it at a declaration time. > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
