On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 09:54:03AM +0200, Florian Echtler wrote: > On Mon, 10 Jul 2017, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 09:11:53AM +0200, Florian Echtler wrote: > > > > > > Related question: we first attempted to label non-touch objects as MT_TOOL_PALM, > > > but it looks like userspace (Xorg in particular) doesn't actually distinguish > > > between MT_TOOL_* types; is that correct? > > > > It really should, but I think Peter never got around implementing this. > > > > Also, I think it is a good idea to set touch major to max in this case. > > I believe that that will help clients that do no understand MT_TOOL_PALM > > to still do palm rejection. > > > > Peter? > > Would you consider merging v2 of the patch regardless of the Xorg situation? > Right now, it's a useful bugfix in any case, and we can deal with how to > represent blobs/palms/tokens later on. sorry about the delay, bit chaotic here. libinput 1.8 was released a week or so ago and it supports MT_TOOL_PALM, so consider userspace ready for that. I also have patches to use major/minor for palm detection where appropriate which will hit git master (my) tonight. That's the libinput situation sorted I think, don't expect synaptics to catch up with that though (unless someone ends up writing the patches). Cheers, Peter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
