On Thu, 2017-05-18 at 22:21 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> When building for 32-bit architectures, we get a harmless warning:
>
> intel-ish-hid/ishtp-hid-client.c: In function 'process_recv':
> intel-ish-hid/ishtp-hid-client.c:139:7: error: format '%lu' expects
> argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type
> 'unsigned int' [-Werror=format=]
>
> This changes the format string to print size_t variables using %zu
> instead.
Is the ordering of patch correct?
ISH config depends on X86_64, so it would not be enabled for 32 bit
build.
So your patch 5/5 will adding "|| COMPILE_TEST", hence it is building.
Thanks,
Srinivas
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ishtp-hid-client.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ishtp-hid-client.c
> b/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ishtp-hid-client.c
> index 5c643d7a07b2..157b44aacdff 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ishtp-hid-client.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ishtp-hid-client.c
> @@ -136,10 +136,9 @@ static void process_recv(struct ishtp_cl
> *hid_ishtp_cl, void *recv_buf,
> if (1 + sizeof(struct device_info) *
> i >=
> payload_len) {
> dev_err(&client_data-
> >cl_device->dev,
> - "[hid-ish]:
> [ENUM_DEVICES]: content size %lu is bigger than payload_len %u\n",
> + "[hid-ish]:
> [ENUM_DEVICES]: content size %zu is bigger than payload_len %zu\n",
> 1 + sizeof(struct
> device_info)
> - * i,
> - (unsigned
> int)payload_len);
> + * i, payload_len);
> }
>
> if (1 + sizeof(struct device_info) *
> i >=
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
