On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 08:51:28PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> On Sun, May 07, 2017 at 02:38:00PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > +static int __maybe_unused pwm_vibrator_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > > +{
> > > + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> > > + struct pwm_vibrator *vibrator = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > > + struct input_dev *input = vibrator->input;
> > > + unsigned long flags;
> > > +
> > > + spin_lock_irqsave(&input->event_lock, flags);
> >
> > Hmm, no, this is not goting to work. The original patch had a chance if
> > PWM was not sleeping, but with introduction of regulator and work this
> > definitely sleeps.
>
> Actually PWM is sleeping, that's why I added work (regulator was
> added later) :)
>
> > I think we should solve issue of events [not] being delivered during
> > suspend transition in input core, and simply drop spin_lock_irqsave()
> > here and in resume().
>
> Sounds good. will you take care of the input-core change?
Yeah, I'll add it to my todo... In the mean time, when you sending a new
version of this driver simply drop
spin_lock_irqsave/spin_unlock_irqrestore.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
