On 11/04/17 11:26, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> On 04/11/2017 11:50 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> Add a parameter for setting the resolution of xen-kbdfront in order to
>> be able to cope with a (virtual) frame buffer of arbitrary resolution.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c
>> b/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c
>> index 3900875dec10..90e7981a7768 100644
>> --- a/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c
>> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c
>> @@ -41,6 +41,12 @@ struct xenkbd_info {
>> char phys[32];
>> };
>> +enum { KPARAM_WIDTH, KPARAM_HEIGHT, KPARAM_CNT };
>> +static int size[KPARAM_CNT] = { XENFB_WIDTH, XENFB_HEIGHT };
> if you are about to release yet another version of the series,
> could you please also rename "size" to "ptr_size/pointer_size/XXX",
> so later when I add multi-touch support I can have
> "mtouch_size" module parameter and they are consistent all together?
Sure. After all I think I can merge the patches, as reading width and
height a second time while connecting the device seems to be pointless.
While logically patch 2 seems to correct the connection process there
was never a problem with it being wrong: width and height would have
been already read during probing of the device so missing to read them
again wouldn't lead to any wrong settings.
Juergen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
