> Am 01.04.2017 um 18:46 schrieb Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>: > > On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 04:59:26PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 01-04-17 16:44, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: >>> This reverts commit baf28d91e7b1 ("Input: bma150 - avoid binding to bma180 if IIO bma180 driver present") >>> and commit ef3714fdbc8d ("Input: bma150 - extend chip detection for bma180") >>> >>> Rationale: initially (2012) the GTA04 device using a bma180 chip simply refereced >>> the bma150 platform driver in its board file [1] which happened to work in all >>> scenarios that were tested. >>> >>> When conversion to DT started (2014), we needed to make the driver be still >>> recognised. Hence we introduced the compatibility to the bma180 chip in >>> Linux 3.15-rc5 [2] without further checks if it is really 100% compatible. This >>> worked flawlessly for years with the GTA04 device. >>> >>> Recently (2016), Hans de Goede pointed out that the chips are not as similar >>> as they appeared and the driver works with the bma180 for the GTA04 only >>> by good luck. He proposed to remove the bma180 support completely [3], but >>> we still did need it until we have a replacement. Thus, a condifional compile >>> was added. >>> >>> We have now developed a generic iio-input-bridge which works with any 2 or >>> 3 axis iio based accelerometer. It has been tested on GTA04 and Pyra and >>> works as expected. Therefore we can remove the bma180 support from this >>> driver completely. User-space API compatibility can be restored by using the >>> iio-input-bridge. >>> >>> Maybe it is time to convert the bma150 driver to iio as well and retire the >>> accelerometer input drivers completely but this is a different story and task. >>> >>> [1]: https://github.com/neilbrown/linux/blob/gta04/3.2.y/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3gta04.c#L976 >>> [2]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3961171/ >>> [3]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9325481/ >>> >>> Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Looks good to me: >> >> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Changed subject slightly (we are not reverting because patches were > defective, we are removing support for bma180), and applied. Just noticed: the subject in linux-next has a typo: Should IMHO be "Input: bma150 - remove support for bma180" https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=f069b5a0b27ad4a87e9351e54fbcab3d3f8a9fd5 thanks, Nikolaus-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html