Hello Dmitry, On 03/23/2017 06:45 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 04:14:56PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> Hello Dmitry, >> >> On 02/22/2017 11:40 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >>> The driver doesn't have a struct of_device_id table but supported devices >>> are registered via Device Trees. This is working on the assumption that a >>> I2C device registered via OF will always match a legacy I2C device ID and >>> that the MODALIAS reported will always be of the form i2c:<device>. >>> >>> But this could change in the future so the correct approach is to have an >>> OF device ID table if the devices are registered via OF. >>> >>> The compatible strings don't have a vendor prefix because that's how it's >>> used currently, and changing this will be a Device Tree ABI break. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> >> >> What's your decision about this patch series? > > OK, I queued them for -next. Could you also make a patch to update Great, thanks a lot! > binding docs for silead? > Of course, I will. > Thanks! > Best regards, -- Javier Martinez Canillas Open Source Group Samsung Research America -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
