On 01/18/2017 08:58 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
On Wed, 2017-01-18 at 12:35 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 11:39:52AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 09:46:34AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
[]
diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/bfin_rotary.c b/drivers/input/misc/bfin_rotary.c
[]
@@ -141,25 +141,23 @@ static int bfin_rotary_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
/* Basic validation */
if ((pdata->rotary_up_key && !pdata->rotary_down_key) ||
- (!pdata->rotary_up_key && pdata->rotary_down_key)) {
+ (!pdata->rotary_up_key && pdata->rotary_down_key))
maybe just use ^
if (!pdata->rotary_up_key ^ !pdata->rotary_down_key)
Interesting use case for a coccinelle rule.
To address the coccinelle related problem, I modified the rule to only apply
if the expression is in one line, and if the return statement is in the next
line. That works pretty well.
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
